It is scalable and powerful enough to fulfill entire EDI transaction processes. This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left.
You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit. NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using.
Each resource has a unique identifying tag, just like a web page URL. That tag makes it easy for devices and applications to access required data without complicated data exchange processes.
FHIR is inherently suited for mobile apps. With FHIR, APIs can access required data from multiple systems and provide that data in formats that developers can easily integrate into their mobile apps. And with FHIR, that data can be shared rapidly which is critical for mobile apps since only the requested data is transmitted. There has been clear momentum for using FHIR for mobile healthcare apps.
And in , Apple created a FHIR-based health records feature for its iOS operating system, giving users simple access to a range of healthcare information from hundreds of participating providers. FHIR can help facilitate information sharing, simplify implementation, and better support mobile apps. It also supports important use cases that benefit providers, payers, and patients. Clinicians can more efficiently share patient data among teams to speed decision-making. Insurance companies can supplement claims data with clinical data to better assess risks, drive down costs, and improve outcomes.
And patients can take greater control of their health by accessing medical information through consumer-friendly apps running on smartphones, tablets, and wearables. All of these benefits are good reasons for adopting FHIR. While these document models are effective at defining specific data transactions, they are limited in their flexibility and allow little in the way of customization. APIs operate using a request-response model.
This means that communicating using the FHIR standard functions similarly to asking a question and immediately receiving an answer. This is the same technology used by a common web browser: when you click on a link, your browser requests the corresponding web page from a server, and the server's response is what you see on your screen.
In contrast, EDI requires a separate protocol to transfer documents to remote parties. Common transfer protocols include AS2 and AS4, and while these protocols do effectively transfer data, they add layers of data packaging, extra mechanisms for receipt and proof-of-delivery, and other complexities.
The request-response model of API communication provides the same benefits that these transfer protocols offer, but does so in a considerably more streamlined manner. Even outside of the healthcare industry, data movement is consistently becoming more API-driven. FHIR simplifies healthcare data exchange by reducing the layers of complexity required to package data and send it to a remote party. Viewed 2k times. Improve this question.
Hannan Butt Hannan Butt 2 2 silver badges 11 11 bronze badges. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Improve this answer. It is a generic system capability like storage or a GUI.
It doesn't imply any standard or approach - it just means data is being passed between two systems. There are numerous standards that can be used for doing EDI in the healthcare space.
0コメント